Diskuse s uživatelem:Ducksoup

Pictures

Hi, could you explain what wiolates Wikia policy and what not?

Could you answer my previous question?

So, could you tell us, why it haven´t been any problem for 9 years and now it is? Where are the limits? Some of deleted pics were classical paintings, some of them were "ethnographical" photos, some of them contained a "soft" nudity, but all substantial was covered. If we subtitute these pictures, would be sufficient to blur them, to retouch them or to replace by a drawing? --Karkos (diskuse) 27. 1. 2016, 14:46 (UTC)

You deleted pictures of clothed people (example), historical paintings and sculptures, censored pictures, pictures, where was nothing to see (example 1; example 2) .... Do you have some constructive solution, to replace them by some pictures which would not in conflict with your policy and which would illustrate the text as well as those deleted? --Karkos (diskuse) 8. 2. 2016, 23:47 (UTC)

Hey there! Wikia's policies are violated when, in our judgment, there's pornographic, explicit, or inappropriate nudity. In that Budweiser frogs example, the women are topless and the intent of the image is obviously prurient. Same with the see-through top. What I'd do if I were you is place a black bar over breasts and genitals - that's typically been good enough for us. If you'd like examples, I can give them to you. Ducksoup (diskuse) 9. 2. 2016, 00:02 (UTC)

..in our judgement - I ask for exact rules. I tried to blur breasts, but those pictures were deleted again.
OK, if you mind, you can this way modify all deleted pics... --Karkos (diskuse) 9. 2. 2016, 02:04 (UTC)

Exact rules are difficult to convey, because there are so many different types of images that could be uploaded. The guidelines I outlined above should work in most situations. If there are naked breasts or genitals, use a black bar to cover them. Ducksoup (diskuse) 10. 2. 2016, 00:30 (UTC)

I did as you recommended and you still delete censored file....--Karkos (diskuse) 12. 3. 2016, 03:38 (UTC)

That particular image is probably too prurient, even with censoring. It is obviously sexual in every way. Ducksoup (diskuse) 12. 3. 2016, 03:42 (UTC)

If YOU dislike it replace it by an image altered as you promised on 9 Feb.--Karkos (diskuse) 12. 3. 2016, 03:51 (UTC)

So what shall be done with this picture which is important (not only because of that woman)? Could YOU do it as you promised? --Karkos (diskuse) 12. 3. 2016, 05:12 (UTC)

I am not sure where I agreed to edit pictures, but if I did, it was in error. Wikia doesn't typically do that kind of thing. Ducksoup (diskuse) 14. 3. 2016, 20:47 (UTC)